apocalypse or the end of the world, if you prefer

apocalypse or the end of the world, if you prefer
cyclically humanity poses the problem of the end of the world, especially with the approach of unusual cosmic events, because not knowing them ignores them ancestrally and therefore fears them. From wherever we want to balance the problem by using any view whether religious, philosophical or scientific, rarely fail to rationally define cause and effect, and this is mainly due to the enormous ignorance of mankind, who arrogantly pontificating on right and left, but basically do not even know why it exists, and knows nothing outside of his field of mind and its false beliefs.
The natural whole degl’eventi is constantly moving and our earth is in our cosmos, and is governed by laws that we ignore, and since time is not measurable, but which can be summarized in the endless chain: death / birth. From each cosmic explosion such as new life is born, any change in climate after the devastation it follows the birth of a new configuration of life.
Therefore it follows, even from what little of geological history that we have been “raccimolato”, that our planet is part of the endless chain full death / birth, and therefore is subject to climatic changes more or less intense correlation with all laws governing the universe, in turn dominated the law of its own assembly line: in continuous and perpetual expansion.
Personally I do not sfascerei head much in the know “where, how, when and why”; m’auguro just that in his new “optimal configuration”, humanity Take another chance, and instead of falling back into Law oblivion, for it is a new beginning, giving himself a non-structure, but leaving that era is intellectual, mystical, spiritual, to accompany it by yet another step, the global evolution.